#密码资产动态追踪 Recently, many people have been discussing how the new regulations and adjustments on trading platforms have indeed stirred up quite a bit of concern. Especially for users who want to participate in airdrops through points, everyone is calculating how to configure their setup to get the most value.

Let's first look at the current mainstream strategies. The 2+17 combination totals 19 points, with a monthly cost of around $240, and can accumulate up to 285 points. This not only allows participation in trading pair wear-and-tear but also reliably secures airdrop eligibility—this is a common operation among many large accounts.

But not everyone needs to spend that much. The 2+16 combo totals 18 points, with a cost of about $100, and consistently earns 270 points. Recently, it has become the first choice for many medium-sized teams. Looking further down, the 2+15 combo costs only $50 per month, can accumulate 255 points, and some are eyeing this tier.

By the way, there's an even more "frugal" option—the 2+14 combo, which only costs $23 per month and can reach 240 points. Many are using this as well. Interestingly, the 1+15 combination, which also reaches 16 and 240 points, is regarded as a benchmark by some efficiency-focused users.

If the participation threshold is set at 220 points, and each airdrop is valued at $60, the calculations become clear:

- The 285-point setup can claim about 6 times, with annual earnings around $360.
- The 270-point setup can claim about 4 times, earning roughly $140.
- The 255-point setup also claims 4 times, with earnings reaching about $190.
- The 240-point setup can claim about 2 times, earning around $100.
- The 1+15 setup also claims 2 times, with earnings of about $70.

Honestly, the earning potential for individual accounts is quite interesting.

The key question now is—will this threshold stay at 220 or move up to 240?

From market reactions, if it really falls between 220 and 240, large teams won't be much affected. Instead, ordinary players will feel more pressure. The new rules add a deduction mechanism for points, making it seem more stringent. But upon closer thought, resources might actually concentrate more among high-score groups. In the long run, if airdrop rewards stabilize around $60, high-score teams are likely to push the effective threshold above 240 points, squeezing out the participation space for regular users.

This means that ordinary players who want to stay competitive need to prepare their points in advance. Otherwise, they’ll have to adjust strategies reactively.

Overall, the initial intention behind this rule update is good, but whether the score distribution will polarize after implementation depends on actual data. Hopefully, platform providers will pay more attention to ecosystem health and not let the rules turn into a solo dance for experts.

$BTC $ETH $BNB