Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
#比特币投资主题 Seeing the recent discussions in the crypto circle about Bitcoin's price movement, I think there's a very interesting phenomenon worth talking about.
Different investment institutions and analysts may have differing opinions, which is actually very normal, even healthy. Why? Because they are dealing with completely different types of clients. Some are helping large institutions allocate 1-5% of their portfolio to BTC, requiring strict discipline and a long-term perspective; others serve aggressive investors with over 20% exposure to crypto assets, needing continuous optimization throughout market cycles.
This reminds me of an analogy: when it comes to weather forecasts, insurance companies are concerned about extreme risks, while farmers care about planting timing. Different perspectives naturally lead to different focuses in judgment.
For friends who believe in the future of blockchain in the long term, these short-term volatility discussions don't need to be too troubling. Whether you're optimistic about reaching new highs in 2026 or expecting a pullback in the first half of the year, the underlying logic points in the same direction—Bitcoin's status as a digital asset is strengthening, institutional recognition is increasing, and this is the trend truly worth paying attention to.
The key is to find a strategy that suits you. Are you a long-term dollar-cost averaging investor or an active trader? This decision determines how you should view these fluctuations. Don't be swayed by short-term disagreements; instead, use them to understand the multi-dimensional nature of the market.