One-word board decisively exits the market, and the crash arrives as expected.

**First praise and then see, earning ninety million a year! [Tao Gu Ba]
**

**It may be due to the increase in followers, and I don’t have enough time, but I still want to plan to spend at least three hours a day focusing on communicating with everyone in the comments, helping fans discover and solve problems. So I will reply to comments in the order they were posted, starting from the first comment, to clarify everyone’s questions. If you have questions, please try to send them early; of course, I will do my best to answer all the questions.
**

**In addition, I will prioritize answering questions from the Golden Fans Group. I kindly ask the class leader Yuan Ye 888 and committee member Xue XI, if you have the time and energy, to assist in answering questions from regular fans. Let’s learn together and grow together.
**
If there are any questions that I missed from the previous day, you can ask that question again in the new post.

Ao RD, during the morning bidding, it was a straight line, directly unfollowing, mainly because I was worried it would drop the board, increasing the difficulty of unfollowing. Some classmates asked me to share the reasons for unfollowing; of course, the first point is still to understand it as an outbreak of luck or human nature’s weaknesses.

If it’s not luck and not an outbreak of human nature’s weaknesses, then it’s a technical exchange. Let’s assume it’s the second case: how to quantify the disappearance of bulls through the ratio of bullish to bearish sentiment.

1. Its maximum consecutive rise in the current cycle is a two-consecutive-board gene, as shown in the figure below.

The underlying logic of the two consecutive boards is the strength of the bulls, so we assume the two consecutive boards will replay. Therefore, once its height exceeds the two consecutive boards, we need to start repeatedly comparing the bullish and bearish quantification.

Can it reach three consecutive boards? I believe the first board is very important. Do you all remember its first board pattern? It is a high-coefficient intraday 4-cycle ACBC2, where C2 is the entry point. So, let me ask you, what is an intraday 4-cycle? How is it different from the 9010 fluidity value? I tell you, in this market, it must be big protection for the small, and the small can grow big; so whatever kind of small it is, that’s the kind of big it will grow into. The intraday 4-cycle, as the name suggests, consists of four directions cycling, with two bullish and two bearish; listen carefully, there are two bearish, which means the bearish sentiment exists in the intraday 4-cycle. If bearish sentiment exists, generally speaking, you can only predict its historical replay. Therefore, theoretically, the three boards are funded boards, not daring to change sentiment, right?

If you don’t have a deep impression of the four cycles, I can find another case for you. Do you all remember Western CL?

In the above figure, an intraday 4-cycle appeared in the morning, and in the afternoon it surged. If it drops the board, then you should unfollow it, and the next day it will hit the limit down.

The additional case tells everyone that the focus of the intraday 4-cycle is upward, which is not wrong, but there are bears present. In terms of prediction, you can only do bullish replay; you cannot exceed the bullish prediction, right? This is why, when I was at Ningbo JG, I unfollowed at the intraday 4-cycle at the new high—that’s the reasoning. The intraday 4-cycle can only do a segment of bullish replay; its perfect cycle is relatively small. Therefore, I require the axis dragon to generally be 9010 to be established. In other words, only with a fluidity value of 9010 does it have the conditions for bullish replay and exceeding the bullish conditions; this is a basic requirement.

My requirements may be more than you think. It’s all about connecting everything together, and then doing subtraction; each one is like this, first push forward, then push back, and preferably find the trade-off.

Back to Ao RD, the initiation of the first board is an intraday 4-cycle, predicting a bullish replay.

Not enough conditions? Let’s go again. Yesterday, why did I reduce my position by half on the board? It’s because it’s not yet a high-coefficient funding board. In funding boards, there is a need to distinguish between high and low levels. If I really lay down in a funding board, I would be like other retail investors, waiting for the board to open before I sell. However, at 9:20 yesterday, the funding board created a gap, so I reduced half my position. Now think about it, if we approach it from the sentiment value, it is an intraday four-cycle, not supporting a third board; if it were to hit a limit-up board, it would also be a low coefficient with leaked orders. So, pushing left and right, it could explode the board at the third board; since quantification has this possibility, then I will unfollow completely.

I wonder if you can understand; this is my thought process. If you don’t understand, don’t worry, because my system is unique, and you haven’t been exposed to it, so that’s normal. Stick with it for a month, and then look back to see if your understanding has improved.

When others are greedy, we must learn to be fearful and give them the chips; when there is a double break, breaking the five-day line and breaking the current day’s intraday average line, then when they are fearful, we must learn to be greedy. Every day we are repeating the same thing.

The entire Ao RD, from following to unfollowing, I don’t know what it is doing, what hot topics it has; anyway, no matter how good the topic is, don’t come to wash my brain. Trading must be math, not language. It’s not about who has the loudest voice or who speaks passionately; it’s not like that. Ignoring what happens outside, one won’t bring their emotional trading; I don’t know what Ao is doing. Now looking back at my focus points and my unfollow points, is it bad? It shouldn’t be bad.

Why do 99% of people in this market lose money? Not only is the learning system possibly wrong, but they also collectively follow the crowd, which is a mistake on mistakes. I am grateful that I have walked a different path, but it’s a hard journey, lonely and solitary.

I just don’t have the qualifications yet to talk about my journey, but I will strive for that qualification.

I wonder if everyone can understand this case. If you have questions, please leave a message to discuss.

Now let’s look at the next case.

Lowest 0.77, highest 4.08, density coefficient 4.3, greater than 4, indicating high density. This means that at this position, the funds for bottom fishing will be somewhat fewer; in other words, the worst human nature weaknesses will be relatively fewer at this position. Therefore, the probability of it hitting the limit down will also be lower, and we can predict that there are only a few bears being released, as the worst human nature weaknesses prefer to bottom fish at absolute lows.

In the above figure, looking at its recent small cycle, it dropped sharply today, breaking the five-day line and also the intraday average line. The only downside today is that it is negatively weighted, so we can only look for low points. However, looking at the daily line’s 2+1 time cycle, the possibility of a high opening in tomorrow’s bidding still exists.

Because it is high density, we understand that there are fewer bears. Therefore, the intraday limit down is formed by a small number of bears, as shown in the figure below.

In the above figure, we have already mentioned that it is a high-density stock, with fewer bears. Therefore, today’s limit down is formed by a small number of bears. A limit down formed by a small number of bears is a kind of divergence. Hence, the sharp drop in the morning rebounded; in the afternoon, if it hits the limit down, it will be pried open instantly. With a small number of bears, the other side is a large number of bulls; once the release cycle of bears ends, the limit down will self-open. This part may be a bit abstract; it’s normal if you don’t understand.

If it is correct, it should at least reach a 2% positive weight in the bidding. Of course, this is all speculation. In this market, the risk of trading is the greatest. If the speculation is wrong, it may lead to significant losses, so rational communication is essential.

Fal Sheng’s second release, no need for double breaks, perfectly avoids the pit. In the figure below.

This time, using strength, perfectly avoids the pit. Only if your funds are not trapped can you profit from other stocks.

Personal opinions, for reference only.

Thank you all for your recognition; in this world, only sincerity cannot be let down! My wish is to have a world full of peach and plum trees.