Today's virtual currency case was decided according to new regulations. Someone commissioned an intermediary to help invest in virtual currency, but the platform absconded with the funds. The court's key ruling points are: The intermediary bears no criminal liability if they didn't take a cut, profit, or receive commission from the middle; all losses are borne entirely by the person who commissioned the investment. Although it's possible the investment was a Ponzi scheme, the court's ruling logic is consistent with the situation in the crypto community.