US and allies clash with Russia and China at UN over Iran nuclear program

  • Summary

  • US says Russia and China blocking sanctions committee work to protect Iran

  • China, Russia fail to stop Security Council discussion

  • Trump has used nuclear issue to justify attack on Iran

March 12 (Reuters) - The U.S. and Western allies clashed with Russia and China ​on Thursday over Iran’s nuclear intentions, as Washington sought at the United Nations to further justify the war it ‌launched on Iran two weeks ago.

At a meeting of the 15-member U.N. Security Council, which is chaired this month by the U.S., Russia and China moved unsuccessfully to block a discussion about a committee established to oversee and enforce U.N. sanctions on Iran. They were overruled 11-2 with two ​abstentions.

The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

Addressing the council, U.S. envoy to the United Nations Mike Waltz accused Moscow and Beijing of seeking to protect ​Tehran by blocking the work of the so-called 1737 Committee.

“All member states of the United Nations ⁠should be implementing an arms embargo against Iran, banning the transfer and trade of missile technology, and freezing relevant financial ​assets,” Waltz said.

“The U.N. provisions to be re-imposed are not arbitrary, but instead, narrowly scoped to address the threat posed by Iran’s ​nuclear, missile and conventional arms programs and Iran’s ongoing support for terrorism,” he said.

Waltz said both China and Russia did not want a functional sanctions committee “because they want to protect their partner, Iran, and continue to maintain defense cooperation that is now once again prohibited.”

Waltz noted that last ​week the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency had reiterated that Iran was the only state in the world without nuclear ​weapons to have produced and accumulated uranium enriched up to 60 percent, and had refused to provide the IAEA access to this stockpile.

Russia’s U.N. ‌ambassador ⁠Vasily Nebenzya accused the U.S. and its allies of whipping up “hysteria surrounding supposed plans Iran had to get a nuclear weapon” that were never corroborated by IAEA reports.

“This was done in order to undertake yet another military venture against Tehran and to ensure great escalation of the situation in the Middle East and beyond,” he said.

China’s representative, Fu Cong, called Washington the “instigator” of the ​Iranian nuclear crisis and said ​it had “resorted to blatant use ⁠of force against Iran during the negotiation process, which rendered the diplomatic efforts futile.”

Iran’s UN ambassador, Amir Saeid Iravani, told reporters later on Thursday that Iran’s nuclear program “has always been exclusively ​peaceful,” and Tehran would not recognize any attempt to enforce sanctions against it.

U.S. President Donald Trump ​has used Iran’s ⁠nuclear program to justify his war on Iran. He said this month that Iran would have had a nuclear weapon within two weeks had the U.S. not struck three key nuclear sites in June, a claim sources have said was not supported by U.S. ⁠intelligence assessments.

Britain ​and France told the Security Council that re-imposing sanctions on Iran was justified by ​Tehran’s failure to address concerns about its nuclear program.

France said the IAEA was no longer able to guarantee the peaceful nature of the program and that ​Tehran’s nuclear stockpile was sufficient for 10 nuclear devices.

Reporting by David Brunnstrom; Editing by Don Durfee, Mark Porter and Bill Berkrot

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • Suggested Topics:
  • China
  • Governance

Share

  • X

  • Facebook

  • Linkedin

  • Email

  • Link

Purchase Licensing Rights

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin