Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
How Eduardo Saverin Lost Control of Facebook
When Eduardo Saverin arrived at Facebook’s office, he was confident in his status—not just an investor, but the CFO and co-founder. He invested his own money, dedicated time, and trust to young Mark Zuckerberg. Everything seemed secured in the documents. But when he was handed new shareholder voting papers, he learned a harsh truth: his world changed with a single board vote.
From 34% to 0.03%: the biggest dilution in startup history
Eduardo Saverin held one of the largest share packages in Facebook—1,388,334 securities, representing 34.4% of the company. These weren’t just numbers: they represented control, a voice, a stake in future success. But as the company began funding rounds, his share started to rapidly shrink. Without his consent, without direct negotiations, his stake was diluted to an improbable 0.03%—a minimal share that practically stripped him of any influence.
This wasn’t ordinary capital dilution. Zuckerberg’s and the board’s strategy was clear: to push out anyone who could challenge their control. Eduardo Saverin became a victim of a classic early startup power grab.
Why was Eduardo Saverin pushed out?
Tensions arose quickly. Zuckerberg and Saverin had different visions for the company’s development. While Saverin focused on financial stability and control, Zuckerberg aimed for aggressive expansion. Conflicting interests led the young founder to build a coalition with venture investors to weaken his former partner’s influence.
When major venture capital players entered Facebook, they shared one goal: maximum control for Zuckerberg. The result was a series of funding rounds that systematically wiped out Saverin’s stake.
The story depicted in the film
Eduardo Saverin’s story became the plot of the 2010 film “The Social Network,” where his character was portrayed as someone squeezed out of enormous wealth. It looked dramatic on screen. But the reality was even harsher: Saverin not only lost control but also tried to sue his former partners.
The lawsuit ended in a settlement, but the damage to his reputation was irreparable. Eduardo Saverin remains forever in history as the person who was squeezed out of one of the world’s most successful startups.
Lessons for early investors
Eduardo Saverin’s story is not just about one person. It’s a warning to everyone investing in early startups: without clear agreements, a seat on the board, or protections, your stake can disappear faster than you realize. Venture capital operates by its own rules, and for Saverin, those rules meant closed doors to the future he helped build.