2026-01-12 11:36:58

Creator platforms are all competing fiercely for exposure and traffic, but some projects have chosen a different path. They do not rely on popularity or trending topics; they only care about the genuine value of creators—this philosophy seems especially rare in 2026. They do not judge solely by follower count or topic hotness, but focus on whether the creation itself is solid and whether it can generate substantive content for the Web3 community. Such a screening mechanism indeed tends to attract deep and thoughtful creators. No wonder more and more people are optimistic about this kind of "quality-oriented" creative ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

airdrop_huntress

· 4h ago

The era of traffic manipulation should have ended long ago, and finally someone is doing real work.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeNFTs

· 4h ago

Really, finally a project that doesn't follow the trend. Compared to those who hype every day, I still prefer to see genuine content. Focusing on quality is easy to talk about but hard to implement. Let's see how long they can stick to it. But on the other hand, this kind of philosophy is indeed rare, no wonder it attracts deep creators. Wait, how do they judge what is "solid"? What's the standard? The Web3 community needs this kind of unpretentious approach. Thumbs up. Trend-following platforms should have reflected long ago, truly.

View OriginalReply0

NullWhisperer

· 4h ago

honestly... quality filtering actually sounds like the hardest technical problem to solve in these platforms. like, how do you even define "substantial content" without it becoming another gaming vector? interesting edge case tbh

Reply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 4h ago

It sounds great, but there are very few projects truly willing to invest in small creators... In reality, it all comes down to who spends money more aggressively. This theory of quality screening has been heard too many times, and in the end, it all turns into a new traffic game. Solid creation? In the crypto world? Ha. Let's get real—how much funding has this project secured, and how much real money has been given to creators? Not judging by follower count? Then how do you evaluate? How the hell am I supposed to know who is a good creator...

View OriginalReply0

PseudoIntellectual

· 4h ago

Finally, someone dares to go against the trend. I'm really tired of this traffic competition. This is what Web3 should look like—quality over popularity. A platform like this was long overdue. Deep creators finally have a place. Projects that don't follow the hype are truly scarce. Betting on one now.

View OriginalReply0