#代币空投 Seeing Lighter crack down on witch accounts, I have to be honest. Over the past few years, a flood of airdrop projects has emerged, and the most common tactic is people using scripts to register accounts in bulk to farm points, ultimately diluting genuine traders. Lighter uses anti-cheating algorithms to filter, which in itself shows they are aware of the seriousness of this issue.

But there's a detail worth warning about— they say "the specific algorithm details will not be disclosed." I understand the need to protect mechanisms, but historically, such statements often become breeding grounds for rent-seeking. More importantly, the number of appeals for witch account screening is "less than expected," which makes me a bit uneasy. Is it really that misjudgments are few, or do ordinary users simply not know how to appeal, or have they already given up?

The most important point— they say they will not adopt dual-token or equity structures in the future, and all value will be accumulated into the token. This sounds ideal, but anyone who has experienced many projects knows that the easiest to cut are those that promise the most. Whether the token's value can truly be realized depends on subsequent actual operations and liquidity management.

Don't be fooled by the name of airdrops. Any project claiming to be "fairly distributed" should first ask yourself three questions: who sets the rules, can the rules be supervised, and what actual protections do your rights have? Being clear about these can help you survive longer in this market.