2026-01-12 10:32:43

Beyond Tech's project design places early supporters at the core, rather than addressing issues retroactively. This is reflected in the allocation mechanism—resources are tilted towards users rather than insiders. Here, engagement determines everything; personal connections are not a deciding factor. The project abandons multi-layer packaging, avoids conflicts over standards like Runes and BRC-20, and does not leave large reserves for the team to dump tokens. This design approach ensures that early participants truly gain value, rather than being diluted or stabbed in the back. Compared to traditional projects' "first-mover advantage + team dumping," this is clearly an upgrade in design philosophy.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MoonlightGamer

· 4h ago

This time I finally see something different. Early on, you could really get something, not just a paper promise. Well said, the team didn't leave a backdoor to dump their own tokens, that’s sincerity. Abandoning multi-layer packaging? It’s like digging up the grave of traditional projects. Participation > connections? I believe, but how long can you stick with it is the real test. Another "innovative" project? Let’s observe first before jumping in. The team not cutting the leek is really refreshing, I can't help but laugh. If this design can really be implemented, it’s worth taking a gamble.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 4h ago

Hmm... Really? Not leaving any reserves for the team? You didn't trick me this time, right? --- Can early entry really make money? I need to see the data to be convinced. --- Participation determines everything. Sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be another story. --- Finally, a project that doesn't cut the leeks. This is the way it should be. --- Abandoning multi-layer packaging, I respect that. Avoid being fooled. --- Compared to those projects where the team疯狂ly dumps tokens, this is indeed more conscientious. --- Is connections not important? Ha, I still want to see who's behind the scenes操盘. --- Resources are given to users, not insiders. I've heard this kind of talk too many times. --- Wait, do they really have no large reserves? Then how do they operate? --- Okay, I buy this logic. Early players can finally turn things around.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 5h ago

It really looks different. No hype, no blackening; this approach of putting early users at the center really hits the pain point. --- Another one claiming they didn't reserve any, let's see how they crash later. --- Damn, giving resources to users instead of insiders? If that's true, it would be incredible, but anyone with a bit of common sense knows that's unlikely. --- Participation determines everything sounds very appealing, but it still depends on actual execution. Don't turn into another way to cut. --- Finally someone dares to say it out loud; the old ways of traditional projects should have been scrapped long ago. --- I believe there are no large reserves because it's really hard to fake. Let's see how long it can last. --- Feels like finding a chance in the gaps, but surviving is already good enough. --- No matter how flamboyant the hype, it can't change one fact—the coins ultimately flow to the rich. --- This logic might have fooled a lot of people last year, but now it's a bit late to say that. --- In my opinion, not reserving for the team is the smartest move, directly blocking all black holes.

View OriginalReply0

HappyMinerUncle

· 5h ago

Oh, this is the kind of serious project it should be. --- Really? The team didn't reserve any? Not planning to dump the price this time? --- Uh... Can early participants really get something? I’m a bit skeptical. --- Finally, a project that doesn’t rely on cutting leeks to survive, refreshing my perception. --- Participation determines everything. I give this design a full score. --- Wow, no multi-layer packaging, and they’re really brave enough to be this transparent. --- Here it is, another "ideal project." --- Networking isn’t the deciding factor? Then I’ve been wasting my time here. --- Backstabbing is really painful to hear. Those who’ve been betrayed before understand. --- Claiming it’s better than crap is indeed good, but the real outcome depends on what happens next.

View OriginalReply0

LightningWallet

· 5h ago

Early participation can truly secure the gains, not just paper wealth—that's what I want to see.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeNomad

· 5h ago

ngl, the "no team reserve to dump" part is what actually got my attention here. seen too many projects with that hidden knife waiting to drop. participation-weighted allocation sounds good on paper but... what's the actual enforcement mechanism? trustless design or just good intentions?

Reply0