Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Buterin believes that one Grok significantly improves the quality of discussions on X, despite its peculiarities
Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently shared his assessment of the AI assistant Grok, developed for the X platform. In his opinion, the chatbot performs an important social function: it actively debunks users who attempt to manipulate the technology to legitimize their subjective beliefs and biases.
The core issue lies in the unique architecture of the tool. When a user asks Grok a question, they cannot predict how the AI will respond. This creates a situation where people who expected support for their absurd ideas instead receive reasoned criticism. Vitalik provided examples of how such cases unfolded before his eyes — someone activates Grok hoping for some support of their point of view, but instead encounters uncompromising refutation.
Comparing Grok to other initiatives on X, Buterin distinguished it as the most significant step in spreading truthful information since the introduction of the public annotations feature. He characterized the tool as a pure improvement for the platform’s ecosystem.
However, Vitalik did not shy away from criticism. He expressed concern about Grok’s training mechanism — in particular, that the training data would include personal attitudes and preferences of specific developers, including Elon Musk, who is directly involved in creating this AI assistant. This could potentially introduce some bias into the system’s responses.
In summary, Buterin sees a balance between the positive impact of the tool on the culture of discussion and the potential risks of bias during its development.