Uniswap recently attracted attention due to valuation concerns. Dragonfly Capital partner Omar released a detailed analysis pointing out the imbalance between valuation and revenue faced by this DEX leader.



According to the analysis, Uniswap's current total valuation is $5.4 billion, but its annual fee income is only $23 million. This means the valuation is 240 times the annual revenue — a multiple that is indeed worth questioning.

Furthermore, Uniswap plans to allocate 20 million UNI tokens for ecosystem development this year. Considering this expenditure along with the current losses, it is estimated that the net loss for this year could reach around $100 million.

In the short term, such negative news will indeed put pressure on market sentiment, and selling pressure from investors is foreseeable. However, from a long-term perspective, another consideration is needed: if Uniswap's fee mechanism can truly be operational and the ecosystem development makes substantial progress, then the current losses might just be a phase of "strategic investment."

The key questions boil down to two points: Can the fee model be sustainable? Can ecosystem investments truly generate value? Until these questions are validated, the market will continue to digest the impact of this data.
UNI-5.61%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
bridgeOopsvip
· 16h ago
240x valuation? That number sounds outrageous, how is Uni still holding up? Whether UNI can turn around depends on whether the fee model can really work. With such huge losses now, who can withstand it? I've long felt that the DEX track isn't as profitable as imagined, and it seems to be true. Investing so much in the ecosystem, if it ends up being a water splash, it would be embarrassing. In the short term, it might fall, but don't rush to sell if you're holding long-term. Overvaluation will eventually be corrected; it just depends on when. Both key issues haven't been solved, so any talk now is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
kmb329vip
· 01-07 10:35
Is there a valuation for meme? Stop talking nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayervip
· 01-07 08:53
A PE of 240x, the level of absurdity really deserves a rating, it feels like now everything dares to be estimated Can UNI's recent losses be reversed? It depends on what kind of splash the ecosystem can make I should have built a position at the low point; now it looks pretty painful If the charging model doesn't work out, all these investments are just pouring water down the drain, the gamble is too big A loss of 100 million, if it can't be recovered, it's over. Cryptocurrency really can't be accounted for
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologistvip
· 01-07 08:41
240x PE, I have to say, wow, who can withstand this? --- It's both losing money and burning cash. What exactly is uni doing? --- Basically, it's betting that ecosystem construction can turn things around, but this bet is a bit big. --- If charging doesn't work, then it's just a big P2P project, no different. --- How to fill a 100 million gap? Rely on UNI token price increase? Laughs. --- In the short term, it definitely needs to be heavily invested, but the key is whether it can turn losses into profits in the long run. --- I just want to know who is still taking this position; it's pretty aggressive. --- Only 23 million in fees, valuation of 5.4 billion, this logic is really brilliant. --- If ecosystem investment were truly effective, we wouldn't need to discuss it now. --- Burning money to gain users, the traditional internet script is no different on the chain.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedNotShruggedvip
· 01-07 08:30
A 240x valuation, this number is indeed a bit hard to believe... but on second thought, the ecosystem hasn't really taken off yet. --- It's another story of "strategic losses." Whether you believe it or not, I'm half skeptical. --- If UNI's charging model doesn't succeed this time, it will really depend on how the CEO spins this situation. --- Losing 100 million to invest in the ecosystem shows some courage... the question is whether it will yield results. --- A 640x valuation is just as outrageous as 240x; even DEX leaders need to consider fundamentals. --- I understand short-term spending to build the ecosystem, but there should be a feasible plan, or it just becomes a money-burning game. --- Let's see if they can figure out the charging issue this year; otherwise, it will be very uncomfortable later on.
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusvip
· 01-07 08:29
240x revenue multiple on a dex that literally prints money... okay so either this valuation is completely detached from reality or we're all missing something pretty fundamental here, which—ngl—seems unlikely given how long uni's been around
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)