Look at GenLayer, I only care about one question:

What exactly does it solve that "other systems can't handle"?
The answer is actually simple:
When AI can't provide a unique answer, what should the system do?

@GenLayer didn't try to force AI outputs into the same result, but instead placed the consensus threshold on "semantic convergence" — your expressions and paths can differ, but they can't conflict to the point of being unexecutable.

This is not a technical trick, but a straightforward acknowledgment of AI's judgment logic:
Disagreements are not anomalies, but the default state.
What the system needs to do is not eliminate disagreements, but build usable decisions on top of them.

This is also the fundamental difference between it and most "AI + blockchain" projects:
It doesn't align the model, but settles on "judgment itself."

You can think of it as a new consensus layer:
Not confirming "whether it's the same value," but only confirming "whether we can still proceed."

If AI is truly going to make decisions in the real world, this question will eventually need a direct answer.
GenLayer just chose to start addressing it earlier.