2026 is just beginning, but there are no signs of relief in the tight supply of storage chips.



In the past month, several business hotels in Pyeongtaek, Gyeonggi Province, South Korea, have seen many familiar faces—heads of procurement departments from tech giants like Amazon, Google, Apple, and Dell are stationed there long-term. Their schedules are packed, almost daily commuting between Samsung Electronics' semiconductor division and SK Hynix headquarters, with a round trip taking 30 to 40 minutes.

The goal of these buyers is quite simple: to lock in a 2 to 3-year long-term supply agreement to ensure their production capacity. But the problem is, the two leading companies with available capacity are not willing to cooperate. Samsung and Hynix are very firm—they only sign quarterly contracts, and long-term agreements are off the table.

And that's not the worst part. According to Korea Economic Daily, both companies have issued price increase notices to DRAM customers for servers, PCs, and smartphones, with prices for the first quarter expected to rise by 60% to 70% compared to Q4 of last year.

An industry insider in semiconductors bluntly stated: "Customers are well aware that Samsung and Hynix are unlikely to significantly expand capacity in the short term." Market research firm DRAMeXchange's analysis is even more interesting—they believe that even with such price increases, major clients can accept it. Why? Because these giants see AI infrastructure development as more important than anything else. Compared to commercializing AI inference, chip price hikes are simply not an issue. Therefore, DRAMeXchange has raised its expectation for the fixed transaction price increase of server DRAM in Q1 to 60% to 65%.

This move by the storage chip giants has completely rewritten the industry's pricing power.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RektButStillHerevip
· 19h ago
Samsung and SK Hynix are really incredible. They increased by over 60 points and still insist on quarterly signing, literally squeezing the big manufacturers to the limit.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 01-07 07:57
Samsung Hynix's move is brilliant; they are determined to satisfy major clients who insist on chips, accepting a 60% increase in price without hesitation, haha.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggeevip
· 01-07 07:57
Samsung Hynix played this move perfectly, firmly holding the pricing power in their hands.
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamervip
· 01-07 07:57
Samsung SK Hynix is really aggressive this time, with a 60% increase and still signing quarterly contracts... This is what dominance looks like. As soon as AI heat rises, they dare to ask for any price.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecodervip
· 01-07 07:53
According to the data model analysis from DRAMeXchange, there is an interesting game theory paradox here: the bargaining power of the supply side paradoxically enhances the demand side's cost-bearing capacity. In other words, Samsung and Hynix's quarterly contract strategies are essentially betting on the rigid demand for AI infrastructure—and this bet currently seems to have paid off. It is worth noting that from a technical economics perspective, a 60-70% increase may seem outrageous, but when compared to historical chip cycles (referencing Gartner's 2024 storage market report), this price elasticity precisely confirms the monopoly position of the supply side. The question is: how long can this short-term arbitrage model be sustained? Once the AI infrastructure investment cycle peaks, how intense will the reverse price pressure be?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776vip
· 01-07 07:48
Once the supply and demand curve changes, chips become like Maotai liquor. Samsung and SK Hynix have played this perfectly, completely mastering the art of pricing power. Under the AI famine, even a 60% increase is just a drop in the bucket. Buffett would nod in approval. Quarterly contracts versus long-term agreements— isn't this a redistribution of power and aesthetics? To put it simply, those who control scarcity win. Big clients are stuck and still have to obediently pay the price. This is the opposite lesson of the Web3 decentralization spirit. Leading chip manufacturers have fully demonstrated what absolute pricing power looks like.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)