Congressional scrutiny intensifies around FireAid's $100M wildfire relief distribution. Lawmakers are raising tough questions about how the funds are being allocated and managed. The House committee's investigation signals growing attention on transparency within crypto-based charitable initiatives. As major relief efforts unfold, proper accountability becomes critical for maintaining trust in decentralized giving platforms during crisis response.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RektCoastervip
· 1h ago
The lawmakers are paying attention, which shows that this matter isn't handled cleanly enough. Can a hundred billion dollars be managed without strict oversight?
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlackervip
· 01-07 06:57
Hmm, FireAid is being targeted again. Congress folks just can't sit still...
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemistvip
· 01-07 06:45
Checking the accounts again? Throwing 100M to really put out the fire, or will it just lead to more on-chain address disputes?
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroupvip
· 01-07 06:38
Not again, checking out crypto charity projects? Every time there's a major event, you target us. Traditional foundations have more scandals, alright...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)