The G7 controlled global markets for centuries—dominating through the 1800s and much of the 20th century. But something shifted around 1990. That's when the reversal kicked in.



What happened? Two things collided at once. First, factories shut down across G7 nations. Manufacturing bases that built these economies got hollowed out. Second, their overall share of global economic output started sliding—hard.

This wasn't random. As Western economies deindustrialized, emerging markets captured production and growth. The dominance simply redistributed. Seven charts tell the story of how this two-pronged shift reshaped the world economy in real time.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterWangvip
· 4h ago
Oh no, 1990 was really a watershed moment... factories closed, production capacity moved away, and their status was gone. The West basically cut the cake into pieces and handed it out themselves.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMinervip
· 23h ago
The wave of industrial transfer in the 1990s was truly a turning point. When Western factories shut down, production capacity flowed to emerging markets. Watching this move, it feels like a game of great power rivalry.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoastervip
· 01-05 08:08
The hurdle in 1990 really changed everything, caused by Western industrial hollowing out. 2. So, once manufacturing takes off, the economic status is gone... Maybe it's a bit late to wake up. 3. Now I understand what power transfer means; the G7's tricks have run their course. 4. Factories closed, and the cake was taken by emerging markets—it's that simple. 5. Should have seen it coming earlier; back when hollowing out started, it was clear who was about to take off. 6. No wonder the strategies have all changed now; it really started to turn around back in the 90s. 7. But on the other hand, the ones who truly made money were those who saw this trend early. 8. Manufacturing moved east, and wealth followed—don't tell me this is free market. 9. The chart must be heartbreaking... How did the West fall to this state in just twenty years? 10. Damn, this turnaround speed is much faster than I expected.
View OriginalReply0
HorizonHuntervip
· 01-05 08:07
The wave of deindustrialization in the 1990s really made the West a joke, and they're still pretending... China and India directly took their lunch.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuckvip
· 01-05 07:57
The line in 1990 was really a watershed moment. The hollowing out of Western industry should have been clear long ago. Once manufacturing leaves, the money just flows out. Isn't this the current pattern? So, the deindustrialization move really hits close to home... The East takes over Western production capacity, and the economic map just flips. Thinking about it, industrial transfer = wealth transfer, no problem. Why do factories have to be moved away? What's the point?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKingvip
· 01-05 07:55
The real power shift in the 90s was when the West freeloaded on global dividends for hundreds of years, and then suddenly factories all moved to Asia. How hard do you have to work to make up for what was lost? By the way, has there been any airdrop from an emerging market country that I haven't snatched?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)