#数字资产动态追踪 The recent turmoil on the Flow blockchain came suddenly and heavily.

A $3.9M vulnerability attack shattered the ecosystem's tranquility. As a Layer 1 public chain focused on NFTs and gaming, Flow suffered a severe blow due to security flaws in its smart contracts. The network's proactive pause mitigated further damage, but at a significant cost—DApp users relying on this chain faced difficulties, with asset withdrawals and transaction settlements all halted.

The market's reaction was immediate. The FLOW token plummeted 25% within just 7 days, as investors expressed their distrust in this security incident with real money. What does this number represent? It’s a reassessment of network stability and a re-pricing of technical risks.

Even more concerning is the predicament of NFT lending businesses. This sector is inherently sensitive—any disturbance can ripple through the entire ecosystem. Restarting the network's second phase is just the beginning of reactivating its functions. Full recovery could take a considerable amount of time, and users with locked assets are already anxious.

Interestingly, behind Flow stands major institutions like Meta. Even with support from industry giants, technical vulnerabilities could not be entirely eliminated. This serves as a profound reminder for the entire industry—funding scale does not equate to security levels, and fame cannot buy invulnerable code.

A broader reflection points to audits and formal verification. A hacker attack might take years to repair in terms of reputation and user confidence. The lesson from Flow underscores a simple yet profound truth: security is not optional but the foundation for the healthy development of the Web3 ecosystem. The industry should treat this as a wake-up call, not an isolated incident.