A project with a scale of 300K has exhibited an interesting chip concentration phenomenon. The development team holds 30% of the total chips, and core members' holdings account for over 10%. What is the result? Just through transactions by these two accounts, they earned a profit of 50,000 USDT. This reflects the current distribution characteristics of many new projects: core parties hold a large amount of early chips, and market fluctuations often make them the biggest beneficiaries. For ordinary participants, understanding the chip structure of the project team and early holders helps to evaluate risks and opportunities more rationally.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DefiOldTrickstervip
· 4h ago
Ha, that's what I was talking about. Retail investors are always paying tuition to the big players. --- Is it the same old story? Team takes 30% + core 10%, the remaining 60% is for the retail investors to play with. Laughing to death. --- 50,000 USDT? I saw this kind of return back in 2005. It's really nothing special now. --- Concentrated chips are concentrated chips, but the key is whether you're brave enough to catch the knife when they dump. --- I already said it early on. Looking at on-chain data is a hundred times better than listening to whitepapers. Beginners just can't believe this. --- A 300K project can also yield 50,000 USDT? Luckily, I’m still hustling in DeFi.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryBabyvip
· 10h ago
That's why I always say that analyzing the distribution of chips is more important than reading the white paper. 30% is in the team's hands? Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
DYORMastervip
· 01-04 23:16
With 30%+10% in hand, 50,000 USDT just got credited... Where's the decentralization we promised? Haha
View OriginalReply0
SneakyFlashloanvip
· 01-04 20:05
That's why I never chase projects where the team holds more than 40% of the tokens; it's too obvious.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictimvip
· 01-04 20:00
It's the same old trick again, with 30% team and 10% core members. How can they still have the audacity to talk about new projects... Retail investors' hard-earned money has become their ATM. --- 50,000 USDT? No big deal. With this kind of token structure, they can easily manipulate the market to harvest retail investors. For us retail investors, entering is just sending money to them. --- It's truly incredible. Looks like reasonable data, but it's actually a carefully designed trap... Early-stage tokens + insider information, why should we bear the same risks? --- This is called information asymmetry. They know the bottom line, while we are just guessing. The question is, how can we avoid falling into this trap? --- From the token distribution, this project is a goner. Who still dares to participate? I don't believe that rational assessment can save this kind of situation. --- To put it simply, it's still that saying: in blockchain, being a leek (retail investor) means accepting your fate. Their win is our loss.
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefathervip
· 01-04 19:55
Same old trick again, 30% team, 10% core, playing their own game to make 50,000 USD, and retail investors just wait to take over the leftovers.
View OriginalReply0
ShortingEnthusiastvip
· 01-04 19:49
30%+10% can earn 50,000 USDT? Bro, this is just blatant leek harvesting. When retail investors get in, it's a pre-set trap.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRidervip
· 01-04 19:44
30% + 10% of the chips are in two accounts. Isn't this just a blatant setup to cut the leeks? While we receive 50,000 USDT, we're still losing money.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)