Many people discuss @magicblock, and their perspective still stays at the "performance tools" level.

But what it truly changes is not just "whether things can be moved onto the chain," but the first time that teams need to seriously answer a question:
Is it worth putting everything on-chain?

Past off-chain designs were mostly driven by practical constraints.
Latency, cost, state synchronization—any loss of control in these areas could drag down complex applications.
On-chain isn't because we don't want to use it; it's because we can't afford to.

MagicBlock compresses these structural frictions to a sufficiently low level, making full on-chain operation no longer an idealistic goal but a calculable and maintainable engineering choice.

Once logic and state are fully retained on the chain, things change.
Rules can no longer be arbitrarily modified, the world won't pause because a server goes offline, and applications no longer depend on a team being "continuously online."
The system begins to resemble a real world, rather than a product that could shut down at any moment.

This may not be fatal for short-term applications, but for long-running, continuously evolving global applications, it represents a fundamental shift in underlying assumptions.
MagicBlock is not about helping projects "go live faster," but about making some designs that were previously impossible, possible for the first time.