Ladies and gentlemen, Christmas is just around the corner, but the crypto market is surprisingly cold. Bitcoin has fallen 22.8% in the fourth quarter, and the $85,000 level was not held, resulting in a 5% loss since the beginning of the year. In contrast, gold has risen 69%, creating a stark difference.



Currently, the market voices are very mixed. Some say there will be a rebound after the holiday, while others believe the bear market will accelerate. I want to analyze this from another perspective, and the conclusion may surprise you—short-term rebounds are definitely coming, but the problem is, after the rebound, instead of a rapid decline, it will be a slow, downward "simmering" like the boiling frog.

Why will a short-term rebound inevitably occur? Two reasons. First, liquidity exhaustion. During the Christmas holiday, global market participants decrease significantly. As long as there is some capital entering the market, it can leverage the price. Looking at liquidation activity, the 90,000 to 95,000 USD range is heavily shorted, and a little buying pressure can trigger stop-losses, naturally pushing the price upward.

Second, the options market game. Major institutions currently hold a $300 million gamma risk exposure, locking the price tightly between 85,000 and 90,000 USD. When the holiday options expiration occurs, this pressure will be released, most likely resulting in an upward breakout—big players will first induce buying to lure longs before they can smoothly smash the market down.

But here is a key turning point: why is it that after the rebound, the market will experience a downward trend rather than an accelerated bear market? Many people naturally think that if demand disappears, prices will fall rapidly. Looking at the past three bear markets, they actually consist of three stages: a sharp decline (which we are in now), then a sideways decline (initiated after the rebound), and finally, bottoming out repeatedly. Although demand is shrinking now, it is far from reaching the level of "panic selling," so an accelerated downward move is unlikely.
BTC1.07%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SerumSquirrelvip
· 3h ago
Here we go again with the boiling frog in warm water routine, getting a bit tired of it, old buddy. A rebound is a rebound, why bother making up a story? Let's wait and see how the options play out on Boxing Day, it doesn't really have anything to do with me anyway. The 69% increase in gold is truly incredible, yet we're still here debating whether the rebound will happen or not. I believe in the liquidity crunch, but the routine of诱多砸盘 (诱多 smashing the market) is really everywhere now. Slow decline vs rapid drop, honestly, it all ends up with losses either way. Big players holding $300 million in gamma, let's just wait to get cut, haha.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorkervip
· 3h ago
The feeling of boiling a frog in warm water is the most uncomfortable kind.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallengervip
· 4h ago
The data shows that this set of logic is full of flaws. Can a $300 million Gamma exposure determine the direction? Ironically, the last time someone was so certain about options betting, the market directly reversed and broke through [cold laugh]. I'm not criticizing, but anyone who has experienced the 2018 bear market knows that a gentle decline like "boiling a frog in warm water" is often the last farewell from big V players. Objectively speaking, using the past three bear markets to endorse the current situation is indeed bold. The problem is, which three? 2009 to 2011? 2015 to 2017? The macro environment and participant structure are fundamentally different each time. What's interesting is that everyone is calculating what will happen if liquidity dries up, but no one has considered that if institutions really want to dump, the holiday period with fewer people might actually be the best window.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 4h ago
Boiling a frog in warm water, just hearing it makes me uncomfortable... But on the other hand, this logic is indeed much more reliable than those "end-of-month rebounds" jokes. Manipulating the market to induce selling, old trick, big players are just playing with this. Gold has risen 69%, I really can't understand this market. A slow decline is more torturous than a quick sell-off, feels like dying slowly. This time, the holiday date options delivery feels like it will be a turning point. Wait, a $300 million gamma exposure can lock in the price? Seems like the market depth is underestimated. Boiling a frog in warm water is well said; a rebound is just a buffer, not a reversal.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmarevip
· 4h ago
The analogy of boiling frogs in warm water is brilliant—more terrifying than a rapid decline. In this situation, there's no way to endure. Waiting for options settlement and watching liquidity—big players' moves are really clever. As small retail investors, we're just passively taking the hits. Honestly, whether there's a rebound or not, we're losing either way. It all depends on who can hold on. Gold rising 69% really slapped us in the face. I'm now regretting not allocating gold earlier. This wave will probably shake out another batch of people. The bottom keeps repeating, right? So I'll just lie low for now and wait for signals.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)