2025-12-25 23:20:46

The trend of the ZBT project indeed makes people's eyes blur. When it first launched, it was extremely popular, reaching close to $0.89 and becoming a market darling. However, it then dropped over 86%, a decline so large that it really stings. But a closer look at the technical foundation of this project reveals that the story is far from simple — it aims to redefine blockchain privacy and compliance using zero-knowledge proofs and trusted execution environments. The market has experienced frenzy and fear, and now it’s actually a good time to evaluate its true value.

From a technical perspective, ZBT definitely has substance. The core team all come from cryptography backgrounds, and they have previous experience in the Ethereum ecosystem. Currently, ZEROBASE is a zero-knowledge proof acceleration network, capable of generating proofs in milliseconds, which remains competitive in the industry. zkLogin privacy login, zkDarkPool large-scale private transactions — these application solutions really hit the pain points of scaling Web3. Privacy and compliance have always been the biggest bottlenecks for development, and many projects get stuck here and can’t move forward.

What’s even more interesting is what happened afterward. During this price decline, the ecosystem surprisingly expanded in reverse. On-chain data is in front of us — by 2025, active addresses on the network are expected to grow by over 150%, and the number of token holders is steadily increasing. This is rare in a bear market. Usually, when prices collapse, project popularity also wanes, but ZBT’s fundamentals remain intact. Support from top institutions is still present, and these signals together suggest that the market at that time may have been driven by extreme panic.

ZBT33.85%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropF5Bro

· 3h ago

86% decline, how strong must one's heart be to avoid cutting losses? I really respect these people's faith. Active addresses increased by 150%? How is that possible? The price has already been hammered down, and people are still rushing in? Can zkDarkPool really solve privacy issues, or is it just another concept hype? Institutions are still holding up, so I'll just observe for now—neither bottom-fishing nor shorting. It's surprising that so many projects in the zero-knowledge proof space are getting stuck; if ZBT can really come out ahead, that would be a story. Basically, it's about betting on the team and ecosystem data; everything else is just superficial. Could the addresses accumulated at low levels be institutions laying the groundwork for bottom-fishing? That's the key.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 3h ago

Wait a minute, can an 86% decline still be survivable? The fundamentals haven't collapsed, so that's definitely worth a look. --- That zkLogin setup sounds pretty good, but I wonder what the actual adoption rate is. --- 150% address growth in a bear market? That data seems a bit off, need to verify it. --- Compared to technology, I'm more concerned about whether institutions are still holding positions—that's the real confidence indicator. --- It sounds nice, but the key is to wait for a killer app to emerge in the ecosystem, otherwise it's all for nothing. --- From 0.89 to now, those who bought the dip must be making a killing. I kinda regret not jumping in. --- Privacy and compliance have always been either a pseudo-need or a real pain point. Honestly, I haven't really figured it out yet. --- Ecosystem data growth doesn't necessarily mean the token will go up. There might be pitfalls here, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 3h ago

86% decline is really absolute, but data doesn't lie. The active address surge of 150% is quite interesting. The price crash really scared off the retail investors. The fact that institutions didn't run away shows they still have confidence. If zkDarkPool can really be implemented, privacy compliance is indeed a pain point. Can the ecosystem expand during a bear market? Either the team truly believes in themselves, or they're just trying to lure in short sellers. We've seen projects that operate in reverse; is betting on this one going to work?

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 4h ago

Damn, this drop of 86%? It really feels like being torn from heaven and thrown into hell. Wait, the fundamentals haven't worsened; they're actually expanding? Is it true that active addresses have increased by 150%? That's a bit unbelievable. The zkLogin approach really hits the pain points; finally, someone is taking privacy compliance seriously. Institutions are still supporting it, which suggests it's not just a pump-and-dump scheme; maybe the panic selling was a mistake. Should I buy the dip now or keep observing? I'm a bit unsure, no lie. Coming from a cryptography team, this background is at least more reliable than those air projects. Is the price being hammered down like this actually an opportunity? Or is it another big trap? Time will tell.

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySlayer

· 4h ago

An 86% drop is truly brutal, but on-chain data has increased by 150%? This contrast is quite interesting... No matter how harsh the price drops, the fundamentals haven't collapsed. This is the real test for the team. The zkLogin approach indeed solves pain points, but can compliance really be implemented, or is it just another concept hype? As long as institutions are still supporting, it indicates that things are not that simple. It might really be a bottom formed by panic selling. Privacy and compliance running in parallel sound very advanced, but I'm just worried it will turn into the next PPT project.

View OriginalReply0