🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Found something interesting while reviewing my top tracks this year—AI-generated music ranked as my number 5 most played. And honestly? I think people are overthinking this.
The whole 'AI music is bad' narrative needs a reality check. It's not a threat to creativity, it's expanding what's possible. Yeah, sure, there are concerns worth discussing—copyright issues, authenticity in the art world, that sort of thing. But dismissing it outright misses the actual opportunity.
Think about it: AI tools are making music production accessible to people who couldn't afford studio time or formal training before. Independent creators can experiment faster. The collaboration between human intent and algorithmic precision? That's genuinely interesting from a production standpoint.
The real question isn't whether AI music is 'good' or 'bad'—it's about how we integrate it into existing creative ecosystems. On-chain music rights, decentralized creator platforms, new monetization models for collaborative AI-human tracks. That's where the conversation should be heading.