2025-12-25 20:22:09

Recently, I’ve been paying attention to an interesting project — it brings the logic of group buying into the Web3 world. In simple terms, everyone participates together, reducing the cost barrier for individual users through pooling.

The project team’s idea is quite straightforward: 8.3 billion people worldwide, each pooling 10U, to achieve consensus and value release through collective effort. This model has already been proven in internet commerce, and now transplanting it into the crypto space is indeed innovative.

From an participation perspective, this approach allows ordinary people to enter with a lower threshold, without having to invest a large sum all at once. The small-amount, multi-user logic naturally has community attributes. The project aims to create a new ecological application for the Web3 era, rather than just hype around a token.

Of course, any new project carries risks, but exploring this new model is still worth paying attention to. If it can truly involve more people in Web3 development, that would be the real significance.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MonkeySeeMonkeyDo

· 8h ago

This logic seems a bit off. 8.3 billion people times 10U each? How many people will actually follow along?

View OriginalReply0

DeFi_Dad_Jokes

· 8h ago

Is that all? The group buying model in Web3 is still the same old thing, just a different coat of paint. Here comes another scam to lure newcomers in. Asking for 10U per person sounds simple, but in reality? I've seen this logic too many times. Usually, the front end eats the meat, and the back end drinks the soup. It's called an ecological application in the nicest terms, but it's just about cutting the leeks... Wait, can this really get off the ground? Feels like the risks are huge. Copying Chinese internet stuff directly into crypto always feels a bit off. Hmm, the idea is okay, but it depends on whether the team is reliable—that's the core. Small investments definitely lower the barrier to entry, but they also make it easy to be caught off guard and exploited. It's about consensus and value release—these buzzwords are everywhere, but actual operational capability is what matters. If this model becomes popular, we're probably going to see a bunch of copycat projects again.

View OriginalReply0

ContractFreelancer

· 9h ago

Hey, is the拼购 logic moving into Web3? To be honest, I don't quite understand. Isn't this just a disguised Ponzi scheme? Wait, 8.3 billion people each with 10U? Where does this data come from? Seems unreliable. I agree with small-scale participation, but how can we be sure it's not just another way to cut the leeks? This kind of model works on the internet ≠ it can work in the crypto world. It depends on the actual business logic. Community attributes don't equal project value. Don't be fooled by the packaged concepts. But it is indeed interesting, just hard to guard against. Let's wait and see. Another so-called new ecosystem, sounds just like a fundraising story.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSnapHunter

· 9h ago

Wait, just by pooling 10U each, can we change the world? That logic sounds a bit shaky. It's both group buying and Web3—this combo feels easy to stumble into pitfalls. Small amounts for many seem democratic, but when it comes to cutting, whoever runs faster wins. But I do have to admit, migrating internet gameplay onto the blockchain is still somewhat interesting. If it can really be implemented, then it's a win. For now, we're just waiting to see who can survive until that day.

View OriginalReply0

CafeMinor

· 9h ago

Uh, isn't this just a disguised pyramid scheme group buying? It sounds great, but the number of 10U per person to reach 8.3 billion people... Wake up, my friend. I've heard this small-amount participation argument many times before, and in the end, it still gets exploited. The internet model doesn't necessarily work for Web3; the two worlds' logic are fundamentally different. Lowering the threshold actually increases the risk, everyone knows that. It's quite daring to think about it, give some creative points, but I'll still observe and see.

View OriginalReply0