When Bitcoin breaks through $20,000, many people start to ask about the next direction. But rather than fixating on price fluctuations, it's better to look at data from a different perspective.



Traders who entered in 2019 and only followed the trend would have been cut out early. What were the real profit-makers doing at that time? They were using on-chain analysis tools to scan exchange fund flows, track large wallet transfers, and monitor market sentiment indices. These data dimensions reflect market changes earlier than candlestick charts and other traditional indicators.

The market rally in May 2021 is a textbook example. At that time, social media was filled with optimism, but the net inflow indicator of exchanges suddenly jumped to a six-month high—what does this mean? It indicates that a large amount of capital was quietly leaving the market. Three days later, the market plummeted. Those who detected this divergence early had enough time to adjust their positions.

Ethereum and some popular tokens follow the same logic. Decisions are made not by luck or intuition, but through systematic data validation. Starting with a capital of 50,000, the account has now grown eightyfold. Throughout the journey, there have been countless fluctuations and traps, but as long as the methodology remains unchanged, market sentiment cycles can always be quantified and tracked.

This is the core value of on-chain analysis—it turns investing from mysticism into science.
BTC1.25%
ETH0.94%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TradFiRefugeevip
· 4h ago
Well said, on-chain data is the real deal, much more reliable than what big V influencers shout about.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStakervip
· 9h ago
Honestly, I've been using on-chain data for a while, I just sometimes don't bother to look.
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeItvip
· 10h ago
That's quite right, but I still think most people simply can't understand those data. On-chain data is indeed powerful, but frankly, execution capability is the real bottleneck. From fifty thousand to four million, that number sounds a bit outrageous... Have you really not lost confidence in the middle of it?
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWellvip
· 10h ago
Oh, that's not right. The real winners back then were already analyzing on-chain data, while we were still looking at candlestick charts.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetectivevip
· 10h ago
I've always said that on-chain data doesn't lie, but there are plenty of candlestick scammers out there.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizardvip
· 10h ago
To be honest, those who truly make money are looking at on-chain data, and there's no denying that. It sounds good, but the reality is that most people simply can't understand those metrics. Fifty thousand to four million? You need to be incredibly brave to hold onto that number. I was also involved in the 2021 wave, but no one can really predict perfectly, so stop bragging. On-chain data is indeed useful, but it's not万能, and there are still too many variables in the market.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallengervip
· 10h ago
Interesting, another story of fifty thousand times eighty [smirk] Data shows: the last time someone said this, the liquidation rate reached 98.2% Ironically, those who experienced the crash in 2021 could also see the data afterward, so why did they still buy in? I'm not arguing, but anyone who has backtested history knows that the "armchair strategist" is always the cheapest after the fact. On-chain analysis is indeed useful, but are you sure it's not survivor bias speaking? Data speaks, but the market prefers to deceive, that’s the real science.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)